Skip to main content

Ray Waudby Comment On Regulatory Notice 22-08

In response to the threat of regulations regarding cryptocurrency, I would like to say any regulations enforced equals freedom weakened or even loss. Our government needs to downsize , as it is too big and wasteful. Crypto is NOT property of the government nor does it compete to acquire the next bitcoin like the bitcoin miners do. It is a code generated by the blockchain as a reward for completing a block. If the government should be doing anything you should be looking at the technology behind the black chain stop thinking about money all the time thank you

Aleksandr Golodner Comment On Regulatory Notice 22-08

I strongly believe in freedom of trading/investing. There is not much knowledge to have about inverse and other complex ETFs...I dont know how regulators can think this poses risk to public. What poses the risk is limitation of choices for investors. The less choice, the less opportunity to hedge and more losses as a result. For this reason, i ask regulators not to enact this regulation. Thank you very much for your attention.

Douglas Liebhafsky Comment On Regulatory Notice 22-08

Inverse and leveraged ETFs are a valuable investing tool. They are already subject to the normal securities-disclosure requirements, and to burden them with further restrictions would run counter to the fundamental premises of our securities laws. So long as disclosure requirements are met, there should be no impediment to investing -- investors should be free to decide for themselves on the merits of these securities.