I should be able to choose the public investments that are right for me and my family. Public investments should be available to all of the public, not just the privileged. If you want retail investors to continue investing through the rough markets, we need access to public securities like leveraged and inverse funds, which allow us to make bets against the market without the risks that come with shorting a specific company.

I oppose restrictions to my right to invest. I-not regulators- should be able to choose the public investments that are right for me and my family. Public investments should be available to all of the public, not just the privileged. I have made 200% in one stock and over 100% in three stocks. My banking stock is rising. I am capable of understanding leveraged and inverse and their risks. I do not need these measures imposed on me.

Dear Sirs/Madame, I sincerely regret hearing that you are considering regulating my purchase of public investments! I should be able to invest in what I choose, not have regulators choose for me in a capitalistic country! I frequently invest in leveraged ETFS to moderate stock market volitility and put options for protection as well! I have been using these instruments for many years and understand the risks and benefits! Again, the public markets should be allowed to operate freely for the best results for investors and the country at large!

I am a regular investor. 1.Inverse fund helps correct the portfolio better than bond when even a common investor like me can know that market is overpriced. 2. Leverage fund can be regulated but only to the point of reading the prospectus, if prospectus takes 60 min of fast reading then only keep the restriction of not able to buy the leverage fund for 60 min. This should be done only once per user.

I OPPOSE RESTRICTIONS TO MY RIGHT TO INVEST. I want to be able to make my own investments as I please. Ive chosen to invest my taxed income and you as a state step in and ask for taxes again if it is for me to make some money. If I loose, o well but if I win, where is my money? Therefore I have the right to make my own decisions.

I, not regulators should be able to choose the public investments that are right for me and my family. Public investments should be available to all of the public, not just the privileged. experience and perspective.

If law makers impose limits on my current rights to buy inverse funds, law makers will be DRASTICALLY reducing my income earning ability. Inverse funds have kept me afloat during these especially turbulent times in the market, inverse funds allow me to generate income in both directions of market movement. I've already lost 75% of earnings from my small business, which I've had for 18 years. PLEASE DO NOT take inverse trading away from me. It has been a way out of this mess the FED got us into with their money printing policies.

There is no reason to limit the average persons ability to invest. The only reason is to control the small investor from access to investments that have the potential to earn the small investor a good profit. Regulators have no business dictating the investments the public can be involved in.

Leveraged and inverse funds are important to my investment strategies. They have been included in my investments for decades. They are a limited part of my investments, but, they help me protect (hedge) my investments,

It is my right to decide how to invest. I use leveraged and inverse funds to hedge and protect my investments. I should not be subjected to a regulator's test in order to invest this way.