| FINRA.org Skip to main content

Charles Eddins Comment On Regulatory Notice 22-08

Big government regulations are not needed in controlling investment interest. I should not have to have a degree in investments to be able to choose how I invest. My interest in over the counter investments and pink sheet investments has already been blocked and limits my exit severely due to low volume of stock movement. This move to control trading opportunities, is not in the interest of investors, it should not even be considered. The wealthy should not be the only traders with the ability to trade leveraged assets and inverse funds.

Alana Tassi Comment On Regulatory Notice 22-08

I was a previous financial advisor. We became heavily regulated back in the day. The rules are in place and I understand, however when you infringe on peoples personal rights to invest by taking it a step further with the rules and regs already in place, now you are constitutionally wrong with the publics freedom to make fair choices on their personal investments and limiting them in this capacity to create financial freedom for themselves and their family.. A lawsuit is sure to follow regarding personal freedoms and rights. I would be a part of such a suit.

Maria Collins Comment On Regulatory Notice 22-08

I am an individual investor managing my own savings. The leveraged inverse volatility fund is critical for my market volatility and risk management to reach my investment goal of stable long term returns. The leveraged inverse volatility fund smooths out market swings, which is the whole point of stable returns. Other leveraged funds are very useful as well. Don't ban these crucial vehicles for investors. Sincerely