Skip to main content

Robin Yiu Comment On Regulatory Notice 22-08

We should have the right to choose what investments best suit our family, not regulators. Leveraged and inverse funds are critical to our investment strategies, to which if eliminated would create huge losses to our family. Investment rights should be open and on even ground, not made difficult to have to go through special processes to qualify. In an ever changing and quickly evolving global economy, one must have a wide investment range to balance risk and objectives. Please do not restrict our rights to invest in public investments,

Ronak Vaidya Comment On Regulatory Notice 22-08

To whom it may concern, I have used leveraged and inverse funds within the past two years in time of high volatility to hedge against my portfolio. If the instruments are taken away from us, and allowed for use for only to special personnel then my right to choose my investments is essentially taken away. I understand that there are risks involved with the use of leveraged and inverse funds, however, in the times of volatility, risks are also involved with purchasing single stocks as well.

Craig Boyer Comment On Regulatory Notice 22-08

I strongly oppose restrictions of investors to be limited to leveraged and inverse funds, as these type of investments permit investors to property balance, diversify and limit risk to their portfolio in all types bear and bull markets by sector. Without these type funds, our investment opportunities will be limited. It also defeats the need and desire to learn and understand financial markets and products.