SEC Proposed Rule #S7-24-15 I vehemently oppose restrictions to my right to invest in public investments. I am able to chose the public investments that are right for me and discuss with financial advisor as needed. These investments should be available to all of the public, not just the privileged. There shouldnt be any special process like passing a test before investing in public securities like leveraged and inverse funds. I am able to understand these funds and their risks. I dont want any measures to limit my ability to invest in these public investments imposed on me.

you ruin everything you touch.

I oppose the proposed rule. I, and I alone, should be able to choose the public investments that are right for my family without having to pass a test or go through any special process. Leveraged and inverse funds are an important part of my overall investment strategy. The proposed rule would restrict public investments to a privileged few and prohibit market access to many. No government, agency, or regulatory body has the right to "protect" me from any investment. I earn my money and I will invest it where I choose.

Hello, I vehemently object to the proposed rule. I should have the full right to choose public investments that are right for me and my family. Public investments should be available to all of the public, not just the privileged. I object to any requirement that requires going through any special process before investing in complex products. Leverage and inverse funds are important tools for my investment strategies, such as using as a hedge for risk management.

Don't take my freedom to trade away. It's my right not yours!

Please stop meddling in the small investors arena. You have so ineptly and corruptly tilted the scales for the large investors that you should let market participants decide. Your efforts in the name of safeguarding investors is nothing more than an attempt to shelter large investors and institutions. These funds our one of the few ways we can invest in short positions in a readily available format.

Im seeking NO further regulation on leveraged and inverse funds in that this is an additional assault on our freedoms by regulation. Michael t Stone [REDACTED]

I want to choose.

Im an adult. Id like to continue investing in leverage ETFs; I know the risks. I dont need a nanny federal government trying to protect me.

To restrict small investors from trading is a crime in itself. As a disabled veteran, I would be greatly shamed to see these actions go through and see millions of people in my salary scale be unable to invest in Proshares products. Please do not do this, Let Americans trade at their own discretion. I (and my fellow investors) are more than capable of understanding how leveraged/inverse funds work and the risks associated with them. Leveraged and inverse investment strategies are a important part of my investment strategies and help protect my financial future when I choose to use them.