Inverse funds have been beneficial to me in my investment journey..So why interfere? I assume its risks just like I DO WHEN i invest in other instruments. Now when large institutions were bundling mortgages and swindling the little guys the regulators were no where to be found...

Dear SEC,

Please don't put restrictions on crypto-currencies funds like BITO.

More regulations will just make it harder for the small investor, widening the gap between the rich and poor.

This is the same as regulations make it hard for for small businesses to complete with large corporations.

Thank you for considering small investors.

I oppose limitations on our ability to buy the Proshares or any other leveraged or inverse funds. We should be able to invest freely in whatever funds as we assume the risk.

Too much government

To whom it may concern,
I, as an individual investor, should be able to choose the investment vehicles that I deem appropriate for my needs. I am not a child that needs to be coddled. I am perfectly capable of understanding and accepting the risks that I am undertaking when using leveraged and inverse funds. Excess regulations or processes that inhibit my ability to invest as I see fit cause an extra burden on me and waste my time.

I know what I am doing and should not lose my ability to invest.

inverse trading is important for traders and the econbomy.

I manage my IRA in a Schwab account and without the ability to short utilize inverse ETF's to help hedge in this bearish environment. I have been trading for a number of years and am aware of the risk of leveraged ETF's and stick with single leverage products.