Skip to main content

Kevin Dümler Comment On Regulatory Notice 22-08

To whom it may concern,
I do not believe in setting "restrictions" for extra risky assets (like triple-leveraged ETFs) in lieu of simple education on those assets. We're all adults, we should be allowed to use our money the way we want to PROVIDED we are fully aware of the circumstances. If the investor is unaware of the differences between a x3 ETF and a normal index ETF (as an example), then that is dangerous -- fix the problem at the source, don't tack on extra restrictions that prohibit ETF trading even though we are fully aware of the risks. Thank you.

Cynthia Makimoto Comment On Regulatory Notice 22-08

I feel that I, not regulators, should have the right to choose the public investments that's best for my family. Publix investment s should be available to all the public, not just the privileged.

I should not have to pass a test in order to invest in public securities, including cryptoocurrency. I am capable of understanding the risk in these types of investments. And I can also research the risk on my own, I Don't need regulators to dictate my actions

I should be able to decide how I want to diversify my investments in order to achieve my financial goals.

Laura Cundy Comment On Regulatory Notice 22-08

I oppose any action that limits the right of any America citizen to invest in Public investments. I am fully capable of making my investment decisions on my own and am fully capable of understanding the risks should I choose to make them. I do not need to pass a test to demonstrate my investment acumen. The results of my investments will be the testament of my knowledge. This is beyond the role of government and is an overstep that would make public investments available only to the privileged few, the antithesis of public. This is wrong and classist. Do better.