Skip to main content

Wanpeng Cheng Comment On Regulatory Notice 22-08

Hello, I heard about the information that you potentially limit the trading of some ETFs using leveraged and reverse strategies. I strongly be against it, because I believe it's my right to choose the public investments that suit for my family and myself, not the regulators. Moreover, these ETFs are important to my investment strategies. So, please respect the rights of individual investors.

Nikki Henrichsen Comment On Regulatory Notice 22-08

To the regulators: I'm extremely tired of gov't regulators who constantly interfere with every day citizens' freedom in every aspect of our lives. You, regulators and corrupt politicians in DC are so hungry of power and control over our daily lives. You constantly want to cram down rules and regulations on the everyday American citizens, and yet Congress, their congressional staff, the judicial system, the White House, the politicians, the lobbyists are somehow always able to avoid the regulations that you are shoving down our throats.

Frank Fung Comment On Regulatory Notice 22-08

I am not a regulator and I think I should be able to choose the public investments that are right for me and my family, BUT FINRA should not outlaw it altogether. Leverage products from Direxion have this [REDACTED] crazy rebase calculation that is rebased to one every night is insane. FINRA should make them improve the calculation not outlaw it. Leveraged and inverse funds are important to my trading strategies, it is the fastest way to beat the market.

Ernest Sousa Comment On Regulatory Notice 22-08

To FINRA: I want to continue having the freedom to invest on my own as I have for over the years. I want to maintain my current freedom to invest in public securities of my choosing. As an American citizen, I should be able to choose the public investments that are right for me! I am grateful to have the freedom of access to the exchange traded funds that empower me and my family to pursue our financial objectives.