Skip to main content

Russell Hutchison Comment On Regulatory Notice 22-08

Dear Sirs: I am writing to express my opinion that existing investor access to leveraged ETFs should be maintained. These investments are straightforward (leverage 1X, 2X, 3X, etc.) and every investor must understand that risk is inherent with these investments. As with any other investment. I consider leveraged ETFs to be much less risky than US traded Chinese stocks. The Chinese Variable Interest Entity (VIE) structure is highly risky and should be made illegal I believe. Please leave leveraged ETFs along, and ban all US traded Chinese stocks from trading on US stock exchanges.

Ronald Ungaro Comment On Regulatory Notice 22-08

I completely disagree with the proposed regulations to impose restriction or any limitations on my ability to invest in leveraged or inverse leveraged funds. The risks associated with these investments, like any other investment vehicle, are clearly detailed in the Prospectus documents which are readily available to the public. I oppose Government regulators imposing what I view as arbitrary and wholly unnecessary rules and special procedures directed to leveraged or inverse funds.

Joshua Swickard Comment On Regulatory Notice 22-08

Please don't remove leveraged etfs from being attainable by the retail investor. They are an important option in the spectrum of investments available to us. Net worth doesn't change ones ability to research and understand the strengths and weaknesses of given investments. Additional disclosures or warnings to ensure investors know what they are getting into is fine but they should be attainable to everyone.