Skip to main content

Frederic Huber Comment On Regulatory Notice 22-08

I have invested for 30 years. I have used inverse etfs to protect my investments in markets that decline, often because of government actions.

No one should have to pass a test administered by the government to protect their own finances.

This is overreach by a department that I do not believe is looking after my best interests. It is pursuing an agenda that is against my best interests.

Samuel Hwang Comment On Regulatory Notice 22-08

Leveraged funds and ETF's are important tools to allow investors to gain market leverage at a manageable level of risk, compared to traditional methods of leverage, such as the use of margin. Investors who research and learn the appropriate use of leveraged funds are able to use them as a part of an overall portfolio and generate leverage without jeopardizing their entire net worth. In comparison, the use of margin may result in greater losses than the investor's initial capital. Therefore, it is essential for retail investor to keep their full access to leveraged funds.

Alan Stein Comment On Regulatory Notice 22-08

I am opposed to adoption of Rule #22-08. I am not a big time investor, but I invest consistently and I think wisely using Proshares leveraged ETFs among others. I understand the long term risk of investing in these ETFs and usually do so for the very short term, I believe my participation makes for a more liquid market which I believe is the reason this country operates a capitalistic system, In contrast what the proposed rule does is make markets less liquid and excludes me from potential profit or losses which I see as my [REDACTED] given right to exercise in a free country.