Market manipulation and naked shorting is supposed to be illegal. But of course as we can see it's an everyday practice for hedge funds on a daily basis with a minor slap on the wrist if brought to light. How is it still possible for so much shorting to still be going on ?
Jim Reese is Senior Vice President of Data and Analytics for Member Supervision at FINRA. Mr. Reese leads a team of data analysts, risk specialists and data scientists responsible for developing and executing innovative advanced analytics, risk and predictive models, graph and other visualizations to enable, inform and drive the efficiency and effectiveness of Member Supervision and its
Good Morning!
I have bought SQQQ and TQQQ for several month and they are among the few stocks in recent month to earn money for me. I don't understand why the proshare should be restricted. I don't think it's more risky than those small biotech stocks I have owned or still owning. I lost more than 75% for most of my biotech groups - maybe they should the stocks to be
I spend alot of time researching and pay consulants for information for stocks to buy. I don't feel it should be up to somebody else to decide if we can buy shares of any stock.
Everyday the stock market is a risk i am willing to take, i feel this more would allow the rich to become richer and block the everyday Joe out from making money. I feel ther is a hidden agenda behind this.
This is a joke, what kind of a free market scam are you selling me here? Hedgefunds have caused a market crash before and they're okay doing it again because there is no consequences and infinite bailouts. Retail investors can't even have fair competition with them because they have access to darkpools while we don't, they access to naked shorts and we don't, we don't
I recently became interest in investing. I am self employed with no retirement. I am afraid to put money in because I feel like large market maker hedge funds have an advantage by controlling the market. It is obvious that they trade in dark pools to drive the price down, short viable businesses into bankruptcy by making up millions of shares, while controlling the media. It’s pathetic, I have to
I oppose restrictions to my right to invest. I-not regulators- should be able to choose the public investments that are right for me and my family. Public investments should be available to all of the public, not just the privileged. I have made 200% in one stock and over 100% in three stocks. My banking stock is rising. I am capable of understanding leveraged and inverse and their risks. I do
To Whom It May Concern:
I manage a number of family investment portfolios. I am a CPA, Attorney and Computer Scientist. I have been investing in stocks and bonds for approximately 56 years.
I prefer leveraged inverse funds (LIFs) to Stock Options to hedge short-term market volatility.
1. They are liquid
2. I can match a group of equity holdings needed to be hedged.
3. Less risky than Stock
The only way to have any hope of fixing any issue with shorts would be to change trading tech. There should be no reason it is not used on block chain, specifically ledger technology. The settlement of shares in seconds will no longer allow the manipulation and will likely eliminate naked shorting.
There needs to be accurate, timely, and mandatory reporting guidelines around short interest. Accurate and timely would be the important part for the individual investors. The mandatory reporting would be for institutional investing. There are currently too many ways to misrepresent and obfuscate actual short interest information.
