Your Proposed Rule #S7--24-15 is a flagrant and unwarranted intrusion on the rights of individuals to invest as they chose. Who gives you the right to decide what instruments people can invest in? Peoples' freedom to invest as they chose should not be compromised by a self-appointed body of regulators who are overstepping their boundaries. As long as one educates his/herself on what they
The only change that should be made if any is that one should be ablento take a test or quick quiz that proves knowledge of these products and then also sign an acknowledgement and the same should be done for the PDT rule. One is kidding themselves if they think changes here will protect anyone as that would imply that the regulatory body has the right to save people from themselves. They don
I am very concerned about the potential for regulatory over reach in controlling the management of personal portfolios, particularly hedging opportunities presented by leveraged ETFs. I object to new rules. Margin requirement management by brokers is most effective. Do not become a nanny state. No value in that, except for ineffective bureaucracies. I am retired but worked in the industry for my
OverviewThe following tool identifies key cybersecurity risks currently facing small firms and helps them enhance their customer information protection, and cybersecurity written supervisory programs (WSPs) and related controls, including:Highlighting the most common and recent categories of cybersecurity threats facing small firms, including questions to assist firms with addressing such threats
(a) The term "ADF-eligible security" means an NMS stock as defined in Rule 600(b) of SEC Regulation NMS.(b) The term "Clearing Broker-Dealer" or "Clearing Broker" shall mean the member firm that has been identified in the ADF as principal for clearing and settling a trade, whether for its own account or for a correspondent firm.(c) The term "Correspondent
(a) No member or person associated with a member shall accept any payment or other consideration, directly or indirectly, from an issuer of a security, or any affiliate or promoter thereof, for publishing a quotation, acting as market maker in a security, or submitting an application in connection therewith.
(b) The provisions of paragraph (a) shall not preclude a member from accepting
FINRA Rule 5210 (Publication of Transactions and Quotations) prohibits member firms from publishing or circulating, or causing to be published or circulated, any communication which purports to report any transaction as a purchase or sale of any security unless such member believes that such transaction was a bona fide purchase or sale of such security. Firms may, on a discretionary basis, communicate or advertise their trading activity to the market through one or more service providers that disseminate that information to subscribers and the market. Firms that do so must ensure that such information is truthful, accurate and not misleading, consistent with the requirements of Rule 5210.
NASDR has filed with the SEC a proposed rule change to National Association of Securities Dealers, Inc. Interpretive Material 8310-2 to postpone the effective date of recently approved changes to this Interpretive Material and the Forms U-4 and U-5.
This version was introduced with the filing of SR-FINRA-2020-015, which has been filed for Immediate Effectiveness. This version is temporary and effective from May 8, 2020 through June 15, 2020, pending any future extensions.
(a) Service on Each Party
An order, notice, or decision issued by a Hearing Officer, Hearing Panel or Extended Hearing Panel under the Rule 9200 Series shall be served on
• Arbitration Award—Failure to Honor or Failure to Honor in a Timely Manner
Arbitration Award—Failure to Honor or Failure to Honor in a Timely Manner
FINRA Rules 2010 and 103301
Principal Considerations in Determining Sanctions
Monetary Sanction
Suspension, Bar or Other Sanctions
See Principal Considerations in
