Skip to main content

Angela Stallkamp Comment On Regulatory Notice 22-08

I was made aware this morning of a potential change of policy regarding leveraged and inverse funds access. I am highly disappointed to hear this as I currently utilize both leveraged and inverse funds as part of my investing strategy, especially useful to me in this challenging market.

I don't understand what the back story is on why the FINRA is considering limitation or why this is happening now, but I am very concerned and disappointed about this.

Christopher Jackson Comment On Regulatory Notice 22-08

I OPPOSE RESTRICTIONS TO MY RIGHT TO INVEST!
I should be able to choose the public investments that are right for my family and I. Public investments should be available to all of the public, not just the privileged.

I should not have to go through a special process like passing an SAT before I can invest in public securities. My wife and I both hold advanced degrees and have been in business for over 20 years. We have invested in highly skilled financial advisors who have helped to guide us. We do not need regulators to impose their choices upon my family.

Arsenio Staer Comment On Regulatory Notice 22-08

As a research-active Associate Professor of Finance with several publications on ETFs, this is an absolute travesty. There is no substantial evidence in the reduced public welfare due to access to the leveraged vehicles given sufficient and pervasive disclosure of their risks. This is an example of a regulatory overreach harming retail investors and benefitting entrenched industry interests and as such should not be allowed to proceed. I will be contacting my Congress representatives.

Thank you,

Arsenio Staer, PhD

James Snowden Comment On Regulatory Notice 22-08

Individual investors should have ALL investment products available to them, without restrictions, so they can pursue the investment goals that match their specific risk/reward profile. We are more than capable of understanding complex instruments and how to use them to enhance our potential gains or hedge against losses during downturns. Making these investment types available only to large or 'professional' institutions or wealthy individuals would put regular, individual investors at an even greater disadvantage than we already are.

Jianxun Wang Comment On Regulatory Notice 22-08

Hi, FINRA

I am a small investor, and I appose the restrictions on my right to invest the inverse ETF

All stock market is now dramatically dropping, it seems no any policy/regulations can stop the dropping. However, inverse ETFs are extremely powerful tools, which can protect my investment portfolio against the stock market dropping. If I lost the right to use inverse ETF to hedge the market risk, it could be a disaster for my investment at current situation.

Garrett Green Comment On Regulatory Notice 22-08

I invested in XRP because of the barbaric SEC frivolously claiming to have legal authority to do things that they clearly dont. There is no reason for SEC to exist and all SEC employees should be blacklisted. SEC is consistently guilty of creating the very problems it was supposedly created to solve. No barriers to entry should exist for participation in the markets. They just want to reduce retail investors' ability to profit in all market conditions and bet against the failing US economy and overall stock market