Skip to main content

Chris Mellgren Comment On Regulatory Notice 22-08

Please don't further restrict our individual ability to choose investment vehicles that meet our personal investment objectives. While I appreciate the intent anyone should be allowed to invest as they see fit and based on doing their own research. Adding overly high hurdles will limit the investment opportunities for the 95% of Americans that won't qualify and further increase the wealth gap in our country.

Bradley Williams Comment On Regulatory Notice 22-08

I not regulators should be able to choose the public investments that are right for me. Public investments should be available to all of the public, not just the privileged.

I shouldn't have to go through any special process like passing a test before I can invest in public securities, like leveraged and inverse funds. I am capable of understanding leveraged and inverse funds and their risks. I do not need these measures imposed on me.

Leveraged and inverse funds are important to my investment strategies. I use leverage and inverse funds seek enhanced returns.

Tony Skalski Comment On Regulatory Notice 22-08

This looks like just another step towards total control of free enterprise and free thought in our country. I've been a serious and prudent investor in financial instruments for over 30 years. I understand and fully accept the risks involved with conservative, risky, and off-label investments (including leveraged and inverse securities). Since the markets (including Stocks and so-called safer investments like Bonds) have been hurting recently, Ive been looking for downside protection and other investments that mitigate market risk.