Skip to main content

David Predmore Comment On Regulatory Notice 22-08

I'm confused about why these funds should be an issue for regulators. They have been just fine for the past several years, and now they become a problem? This issue makes me suspect, and probably correctly so, that there is "money" behind the regulation concerns. Someone is not getting their "fair share" someway or somehow, and therefore we need to limit those who may benefit from the funds. I recommend just leaving things the way they are just as you have for the last years. Let the small investor be able to benefit during the bad times coming at us soon.

Joel Steinke Comment On Regulatory Notice 22-08

As a free citizen of the fine country, I should be without hinderance in my investment decisions. I do not need these restrictions on my investment decisions, that should not be the role of Government. Complex securities allow me as an educated investor to capitalize on my investment theses. Limiting my access to such securities will result in a loss of profit and an overall delimiting of my potential as an investor. They are fundamental because, Instead of risking 100% of my capital, I can put 50% of my capital into 2x leveraged fund, and keep the other 50% in cash.

Suzanne Flynn Comment On Regulatory Notice 22-08

I- not regulators- should be able to choose the public investments that are right for me and my family. Public investments should be available to all of the public, not just the privileged.
Leveraged and inverse funds are important to my investment strategies. These funds enable me to seek enhanced returns and they are a very limited part of my overall portfolio. I am capable of understanding leveraged and inverse funds and their risks.