Regulating inverse funds is another assault on the individual investor. It is hard enough to compete against large funds and billionaires but taking away the advantage of inverse ETFs which do not require the investor to hold a margin account is an assault on freedom. In addition, the fess saved from not have to pay to borrow stocks are another way to hurt the little guy. Inverse and leverage funds are not hard to understand as opposed to option strategies. Are you going to regulate that next?

Leveraged and inverse funds are important to my investment strategies.
I can manage the risk on my investments at my own risk.

I would like to be on the record that I completely oppose limitations on your investment choices. My personal investment choices should be in my hands and not those of the government. Thank you for your consideration.

Crypto is for the people and is decentralized to keep it out of the governments control that is known to ruin the value of anything it gets involved with

I oppose restrictions on my right to invest. I should have the right to invest my money any way I choose.

I what to maintain my current freedom to invest in public securities of my choosing. Thank You

Myself, not regulators should be able to choose the public investments that are right for me and my family. Public investments should be available to all of the public, not just the privileged.

Please do not limit my options trading. I understand the risks involved and should be allowed to make the decision on how much risk I am willing to accept.

These ETFs provides a comprehensible way for small accounts to invest or hedge certain sections effectively. The underlying risk needs to be made known rather than prohibited small accounts to use these ETFs.

I, the investor, and not you, the regulators, should be the one to choose the public investments that are right for me.
This is a matter of basic principle, and therefore of first importance: PUBLIC investments should be available to ALL the public, not just the privileged, who are already more than privileged enough.

What you propose is part of an insulting trend: the "Nanny State" deciding it knows best and should protect us stupid rubes from ourselves. This has no place in what one hopes is still a free country.