Skip to main content

Vaikuntanath Samudrala Comment On Regulatory Notice 22-08

I likely would fit all the criteria (VHNW, etc.) which I sort of sign off on for options trading at Fidelity yet I oppose this action. There are better ways to achieve investor protection without making them jump through hoops which in practice just turn out to be theatre.

I agree with extensive warning and labels to ward off uneducated investors. But regulator imposed tests, etc. are just another way for test makers to make money and an added cost of doing business with leveraged ETFs.

Craig Gardner Comment On Regulatory Notice 22-08

I have invested on my own for for 36 years, doing my own due diligence, reading, and using my informed judgement. People make all types of financial decisions such as career choices, where or whether to purchase a home, what type of healthcare they access, the foods they consume, where they travel, etc.- the list could go on for pages. Any mature adult of sound mind can make financial decisions of varying complexity without testing for this. Do you take a medical literacy test before seeing a physician, an aeronautical engineering test before taking a flight?

Jerry Gould Comment On Regulatory Notice 22-08

I manage my brokerage and retirement accounts. I make all my own investment decisions and execute all trades. Leveraged and inverse ETFs and ETNs are an important part of my investment strategy. I am 70 and have used these kinds of products for over 10 years. I know the risks and rewards of this type of product and I strongly believe no regulator should be trying to restrict my access to these products.