Regarding Regulatory Notice 22-08, I am submitting my comments opposed to this proposed regulation. Limiting access to inverse and leveraged ETFs is unnecessary and only reinforces public opinion that the 'system is rigged' against the retail investor.

I am very upset to learn of the proposed restrictions and limitations regarding leveraged investment products like etfs. I am a big fan of them and use them regularly. Please keep in mind that also provide safety in that only using 1/3 of my cash to purchase a 3xs leveraged etf allows me to hold 2/3 of my portfolio in cash making my portfolio move liquid than if I had 100% of my cash invested. PLEASE DON'T STICK YOUR NOSE INTO THIS NON-PROBLEM! Thank you. Ed Devine

I oppose restrictions on my right to invest in public investments.

I, not regulators should be able to choose the public investments that are right for me and your family. Public investments should be available to all of the public, not just the privileged.

I should nit have to go through any restrictive process such as passing a test before I can invest in public securities. And I am certainly capable of understanding leveraged and inverse funds and their risks.

Dear sir/madam ! I oppose restrictions on my right to invest in public investments. I'm capable of understanding leveraged and inverse funds and their risks. I don't need these measures imposed on me. Leveraged and inverse funds are important to my investment strategies. I use them as a limited part of my overall portfolio. They help me protect my investment.

We need the freedom to buy leveraged ETFs. Education should be additional not mandatory, people will learn more with practices.

To whom it may concern,

I oppose restrictions to my right to invest.

Public investments should be available to all of us, not just the privileged. I should be able to choose the public investments that are right for me and my family. I should not have to pass a test before I can invest in public securities like leverage and inverse funds. I am capable of understanding them and the risks and rewards in investing in these securities.

It is the investors free right to invest at risk. I oppose any restriction on freely investing.

oppose, disagree

I strongly oppose this regulation by the government. It must be left to the investors to decide what is suitable for their situation. Government must not dictated and decide what is good for me and others. I am highly educated and intelligent with extensive trading experience I don't need government to tell me what i good for me. Enough of government intervention.. ENOUGH Already!!!

After reviewing Regulatory Notice #22-08, I, who am a retail investor using leveraged funds for approximately 8 years, believe the concerns and educational requirements being proposed by FINRA to be justified and appropriate. I would like to differentiate between risk levels for various types of products. Leveraged ETFs tracking very large underlying markets such as S&P500, the DOW or NASDAQ are inherently lower risk than funds tracking volatility.