Skip to main content

Haifa Haj-Eid Comment On Regulatory Notice 22-08

This is an unjust move to limit flexibilities and insurance for our future and retirement. Inverse funds help those of us who do not have millions and cannot gain access to our 401K to safeguard it from the market crashing. I understand that it is a risk to invest in inverse funds; however, that is a risk that I understand, and I am willing to make. There is risk in any investment. It's a gamble; I would not put money that I cannot afford to lose. I don't make bets with money that I need to pay the bills and I would not jeopardize my retirement.

John Meder Comment On Regulatory Notice 22-08

It is absolutely shocking to me that, having ignored the egregious behavior by so-called advisors towards their clients (specifically because FINRA has NOT insisted they act as sworn fiduciaries), FINRA now wants to tell individual investors making informed decisions on their own what they can and cannot do. These are existing, publicly traded securities (vs things like PRIVATE REITS, SPACS, etc which FINRA ALLOWS) with all sorts of information available and should NOT be policed by FINRA.

Bryan Mannlein Comment On Regulatory Notice 22-08

Regulators should not be able to limit which investments are right for me or my family. It is not the government's role to determine what is best for me. I am responsible for my actions and take full responsibility for all investment decisions and strategies that I may take. Please stop trying to save us from ourselves and, by doing so, denying us freedom of choice and access to instruments that are readily available for the wealthy.