Skip to main content

Dorothy Geberl Comment On Regulatory Notice 22-08

This regulation would be disastrous to retail investors who seek to invest in inverse funds to shield themselves from adverse market consequences, for example, by purchasing an inverse index fund as a part of their portfolio when market conditions indicate a market crash could occur, hedging against that outcome. These funds being regulated to this extent will push retail investors towards derivatives to achieve the same results, which are in most cases riskier than inverse ETFs.

Michael Hastings Comment On Regulatory Notice 22-08

1. Leverage to the extreme has gotten us into a lot of financial problems ... people, companies, cities, states, the country as a whole and the world. Mortgages with no money down (total leverage), 5X and 10X leverage bond products sold prior to the 2008 crash or 3X funds for stocks or commodities.

Often, when these investments break down, the issuers get off with a slap on the hand and the investors pay the price.

SO, spend more time watching and punishing the issuers as well as targeting those products with limits on who can buy.

Jacob Roach Comment On Regulatory Notice 22-08

United States citizens are the creators and the product of the democratic systems they make. That's a high responsibility, and one which many American are ill-equipped to make. That doesn't mean they ought to lose it. Likewise in finance, regulators ought to take reasonable action to protect Americans, but Americans are ultimately individually responsible to themselves, their families and communities, and their nation.