Skip to main content

Kent Niedzielski Comment On Regulatory Notice 22-08

A move to block the public from investing in leveraged and inverse investments comes across as yet another disturbing example of moves to give the financial elite greater opportunities than the average person. Rather than making the excuse that you are trying to protect the public from themselves, it gives the financial elite who would continue to have access to these sorts of investments greater ability to take advantage of the public with respect to market moves.

Brook C. Comment On Regulatory Notice 22-08

Dear FINRA,

Obviously the leveraged products you are considering restricting are demonstrably popular, and therefore unless you believe that most investors are irrational, these products must be serving some useful purpose. Please do not restrict these tools, as they are an important part of my personal investment protocol. Even reducing their availability to the investing public could destroy their utility if their liquidity is significantly lowered.

Andres Lubomirsky Comment On Regulatory Notice 22-08

My ability to use leveraged funds is absolutely crucial to my investment strategies. I've been using them for 10+ years and looking forward to continue doing so for many years to come without restrictions. They do have a different learning curve vs other type of investments so I agree on letting people know about the increased risks but ultimately it should be up to them to decide since there's no such thing as a risk-free investment in today's market.

Evan Garrison Comment On Regulatory Notice 22-08

I should be able to choose the public investments that are right for me and my family - NOT REGULATORS! Public investments should be available to all the public, not just the privileged! I shouldn't have to go through any special process like passing a test before I can invest in public securities, like leveraged and inverse funds. I am capable of understanding leveraged and inverse funds and their risks.