This type of should not be removed from access to the genral public. There should always be information available to understand what the risks are with all investments. Those are in place with the current laws. Please do not constrain our investment options with laws that oppress our individual investment decisions.

I Strongly you oppose restrictions for Leveraged funds, Investors who are putting money n these funds are educated enough to know their risk, already a disclaimer is provided, my opinion is No Need of additional restrictions.

I am not a child. I do not need regulators to hold my hand or put their noses in my business.

Dear FINRA,

I should be able to choose the public investments that are right for me and my family.

It is my money. I earned it... and I should be able to invest as I choose, even and especially leveraged and inverse funds. I am fully capable of understanding the risk/reward associated with such instruments. I should not need to go through special processes to investment my money.

Thank you for considering my input.

I, not you, should determine my economic future. As it is, my investments have been hampered by your "qualified investor" regulations to the extent that several great opportunities have escaped my grasp. Further regulations will likely erode economic rights and simultaneously grant privilege and protection to another class of investors.

I am opposed to regulation restricting the access to leveraged and specialty investment products by retail investors. I invest in leveraged, inverse, and commodity funds as they suit my needs. They are important hedges against market movements and inflation. I should not have to jump through hoops to access these products. Prospectuses are there for a reason and it is up to the individual to read them and educate themselves about the risks. Excessive regulation is unfair and restricts free markets. Todays rules strike a good balance between risk and responsibility.

We need less regulation, not more. People do not need to be protected from themselves. We know the risks involved.

As an individual investor I consider
leveraged and inverse investment funds very useful to manage risk in my overall investment portfolio. They represent a minority but important percentage of my overall portfolio and are utilized to help offset and mitigate risk in my more Substantial longer term positions on a short term basis, avoiding disruptive transactions in my long term holdings.

I find it interesting that I would be able to invest in cryptocurrency, and all manners of futures but not inverse or leveraged accounts. Is this to keep the small investor from muddying the waters for the hedge funds and the 1%ers. Lets regulate the congress and their families first.

I should be able to choose the public investments that are right for my family. Public investments should be available to all of the public, not just the privileged. I shouldn't have to go through any special process like passing a test before I can invest in public securities, like leveraged and inverse funds. I am capable of understanding leveraged and inverse funds and their risks. Leveraged and inverse funds are important to my investment strategies. They help me protect my investments or seek enhanced returns.