Skip to main content

Weihong Feng Comment On Regulatory Notice 22-08

I am capable of understanding leveraged and inverse funds and their risks. They help me protect (hedge) my investments or seek enhanced returns for my family and myself. What is more information, according to the Fourteenth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution, I should be able to choose the public investments that are right for me and my family. Public investments should be available to all of the public, not just the privileged class. Please consider my suggestion seriously! Thank you!

Rick Ganguet Comment On Regulatory Notice 22-08

I am writing to urge you not to restrict my investment options. I should not be penalized because some naive people refuse to educate themselves about so called " complex investments". If they don't understand what they are doing they should not invest. These investments are generally labelled as far as additional risk involved. I actually use options and inverse funds to reduce risk. I feel these should be readily available tools. Leverage is a basic principal of investing.

Jason Gerber Comment On Regulatory Notice 22-08

Hello, I believe I should be able to invest in publicly available funds without government interference. I know what is best for my financial situation and believe I should have the right to make decisions based on what I believe to be the best.

I am fully capable of doing the research and understanding what I am investing in. I should not have to prove myself capable. Such measures would be a burden to me.

Carri Craver Comment On Regulatory Notice 22-08

Inverse funds are needed. Understanding them is not any more complex than standard market funds. I understand their risks. More important I understand not having them as an option gives me no option to be in the market when I see that fundamentals are unsound and prices are too high. These events maybe with some regularity. Retail investors should be able to hedge against a down turn in the market without using the riskier call options.