Feifan Chen Comment On Regulatory Notice 22-08
We need the freedom to buy leveraged ETFs. Education should be additional not mandatory, people will learn more with practices.
For the Public
FINRA Data provides non-commercial use of data, specifically the ability to save data views and create and manage a Bond Watchlist.
For Industry Professionals
Registered representatives can fulfill Continuing Education requirements, view their industry CRD record and perform other compliance tasks.
For Member Firms
Firm compliance professionals can access filings and requests, run reports and submit support tickets.
We need the freedom to buy leveraged ETFs. Education should be additional not mandatory, people will learn more with practices.
To whom it may concern,
I oppose restrictions to my right to invest.
Public investments should be available to all of us, not just the privileged. I should be able to choose the public investments that are right for me and my family. I should not have to pass a test before I can invest in public securities like leverage and inverse funds. I am capable of understanding them and the risks and rewards in investing in these securities.
It is the investors free right to invest at risk. I oppose any restriction on freely investing.
oppose, disagree
I strongly oppose this regulation by the government. It must be left to the investors to decide what is suitable for their situation. Government must not dictated and decide what is good for me and others. I am highly educated and intelligent with extensive trading experience I don't need government to tell me what i good for me. Enough of government intervention.. ENOUGH Already!!!
After reviewing Regulatory Notice #22-08, I, who am a retail investor using leveraged funds for approximately 8 years, believe the concerns and educational requirements being proposed by FINRA to be justified and appropriate. I would like to differentiate between risk levels for various types of products. Leveraged ETFs tracking very large underlying markets such as S&P500, the DOW or NASDAQ are inherently lower risk than funds tracking volatility.
I have often traded both leveraged and inverse funds and strongly oppose any additional regulation in regard to their use as investment vehicles for retail investors. I consider those funds as fundamental to my ability to invest and creating further restrictions is a big and unnecessary over reach on the part of regulators. Please do not make life even more difficult.
This deprives retail investors of the right to trade freely, giving institutions or the rich a greater overwhelming advantage and more financial instruments; and will have a great impact on liquidity.
You DO NOT have the right to take away my right to invest the way I choose to or limit my investing opportunities or options.
Let us keep trading whatever we want to trade