Skip to main content

Megan Kilinski Comment On Regulatory Notice 22-08

I oppose any restrictions to my right to invest.

I not regulators should be able to choose the public investments that are right for me and my family. Public investments should be available to all of the public, not just the privileged.

I shouldn't have to go through any special process like passing a test before you can invest in public securities, like leveraged and inverse funds.

I am capable of understanding leveraged and inverse funds and their risks.

Mike S Comment On Regulatory Notice 22-08

The leveraged ETF's are a way for the little guy to make money. One of the big advantages that Wall St. has over the little guy is a plethora of capital at their disposal. The little guy invests with the little extra savings from their paychecks or bonuses. It's almost impossible to build wealth with the little extra savings most Americans accumulate each year. The old saying used to be..."It takes money to make money". Leveraged ETF's has changed that.

Manish Punjabi Comment On Regulatory Notice 22-08

I oppose the proposed restrictions on leveraged and inverse funds. I am already an accredited investor and my use of leveraged funds make up only a tiny portion of my net worth. I understand the risks and see no reason to restrict access to these and other products. They are already inherently less risky than other readily available products like options, crypto, certain poorly run private opportunities, etc. Let people decide for themselves, we already know there are risks and can choose to make decisions for ourselves. Thanks.