Skip to main content

Leon Garoyan Comment On Regulatory Notice 22-08

Most securities require the buyers to exercise due diligence. Whether a publicly traded company or ETF, each individual has the obligation to be aware of the risks.

Increased regulation will only add greater burden to brokers, which the consumer ultimately ends up paying. These leveraged funds have enhanced my trading strategies and made me a better investor. They have provided me with decent returns and have increased my knowledge of the situational market conditions at a glance. They do serve a public service.

Rick Segerstrom Comment On Regulatory Notice 22-08

To whom it may concern. Leveraged and inversed funds are an important hedge in any stock traders bag of tools. Without them, traders could be left without important hedges. Charlie Munger of Berkshire Hathaway recently said; 'We have people who know nothing about stocks being advised by people who know even less.' He is correct in the implication is that if you're going to regulate who can use leveraged and inverse funds, you should regulate ALL consumers who trade ALL stocks and mutual funds.

Jennifer Mann Comment On Regulatory Notice 22-08

I oppose this regulation because it limits my public investment options that fit within my risk tolerance. I am capable of making my own strategic investment decisions without the government imposing limitations. I understand leveraged and inverse funds and associated risks and do not think I should have to go through a special process or test before investing in these types of public securities.