Skip to main content

Stephen Miller Comment On Regulatory Notice 22-08

A lesson learned - As a retired Quality Analyst from Lockheed Martin, trading an IRA, I've struggled with only trading long. I've learned with inverted ETFs, long is only half of the dynamic. Forced to take a cash tends to make one walk away from the market. This disengagement with the market and reengagement is dangerous. With the inverted ETFs one can stay engaged and work both dynamics, long and short. Going long, to cash disengagement is dangerously imbalanced. Very risky. Long is only half the process. For IRAs, inverted ETFs are less risky than individual stocks.

Dominic Gerleve Comment On Regulatory Notice 22-08

Regulating what assets a person can buy is not capitalism. The regulators aka central planners are intentionally or unintentionally turning the stock market into a place where only the wealthy can invest and expect great returns. Instead of regulating the 100's of millions of individual investors your energy would be better used regulating the trades of our congress men and women who seem to get into office with very little wealth and then leave office multi millionaires all off the outsized gains from their investment portfolio, with a gov pension, and Healthcare we pay for.

Rob Digma Comment On Regulatory Notice 22-08

I put 30% in leveraged 3x etfs and then keep 70% in cash. this is an excellent way to not have all of my money exposed to the stock market. I am currently down 20% in those 3x etfs so i need the 3x etfs to exist so i can get back my losses, so you must not take away my opportunity to get back my losses. I use 3x etfs instead of options since options have time decay but 3x leveraged etfs don't have those issues. So please continue to let us use 3x leveraged etfs