Skip to main content

John Headrick Comment On Regulatory Notice 22-08

I oppose restrictions on the right of investors to invest in leveraged and inverse funds. It is important for investors to be able to freely choose their investments without the onerous burdens of having to clear regulatory hurdles. Each investor should have the right to decide for themselves how to best use public investments in achieving their goals. The more free choices of investments available to investors, the better. The public disclosure system that has long been in place for public investments is good as it is and should remain as it is without any new restrictions.

Colin Lester Comment On Regulatory Notice 22-08

There are many reasons this would be an abomination, but I will just go into one. Since the beginning of the NYSE, people have been fighting to democratize the market and make it accessible to all. It is in everyone's best interest that the market is accessible to all. This rule change would destroy all the work to make the financial markets accessible to all, regardless of status, race, class, etc. Why should someone have to be from wealth, and pass a test, just in order to properly hedge their portfolio with inverse funds?