Skip to main content

Larry Harkins Comment On Regulatory Notice 22-08

I oppose restriction to my right to invest. I should be able to choose how to invest for me and my family regardless of my social status. Although I do not currently invest in such investments, I have in the past and may wish to in the future. What I do with the money I have earned is my responsibility, not some regulators. There are already far too many unnecessary restrictions on our activities. This country was founded on freedom of expression and action and it should stay that way.

Joseph Borchers Comment On Regulatory Notice 22-08

I feel I should not have to go through any special process like passing a test before I can invest in public securities, like leverage and inverse funds. I am perfectly capable of understanding leveraged and inverse funds and their associated risks. I do not find it all necessary to have these measures imposed on investors like myself. Leveraged & inverse funds are a very important part of my personal investment strategy and they help me hedge my investments and seek enhanced returns. I take offense with regulators telling me what investments are right for me and my family.

Stephen Schiera Comment On Regulatory Notice 22-08

Regulators should not be the ones to choose the public investment that are right for me and my family. Public investments should be available to all of the public and not restricted to a select few. Prevent fraud at the investment side and not restrict on the investor.

Leveraged and inverse funds are and important part of my investment strategy, they help protect overall portfolio and provide enhanced returns.