Skip to main content

Ramona McMillan Comment On Regulatory Notice 22-08

I am totally against any attempt from federal government regulators or lawmakers imposing any kind of restrictions on my ability to purchase ETFs, or any public investment funds. It is an extreme overreach of federal government. I do not want federal government regulators deciding if I am fit or qualified to invest based on some outlandish set of rules put on me and other investors. It is another example of power hungry bureaucrats making a power grab. Such regulations will negatively impact the markets and our economy.

Gregory Valdovinos Comment On Regulatory Notice 22-08

I believe that inverse funds are necessary to effectively manage my portfolio. As an individual investor it can be very challenging to hedge against market volatility and large draw-downs in the market. Inside retirement accounts, I have very few tools to hedge my portfolio, shorting and options are generally not allowed. That leaves buying of inverse ETFs as one of the few options to provide some hedging protection for my long positions.

Edward Spal Comment On Regulatory Notice 22-08

I oppose ANY regulation limiting my choice to invest in any product or service of my choice.
We should be able to choose the public investments that are right for me and my family.
Public investments should be available to all of the public,
not just the privileged.
We shouldn't have to go through any special process
like passing a test before we can invest in public securities,
like leveraged and inverse funds. I and others are
capable of understanding leveraged and inverse funds helping me protect (hedge) my investments and their risks.