Skip to main content

Paulina Nguyen Comment On Regulatory Notice 22-08

I would like to freely invest in any funds I would like. if the fund activities are legal then everyone should have the right to choose what to invest. When we talk about risk, anything has risk.. Any stock can go to $0, too. I bought TQQQ and I like it. They invest in it for me. I just buy it and see my fund growing each day. Someday it goes down, too but that is ok. It will go back up.

Judd Hall Comment On Regulatory Notice 22-08

I should be able to freely choose the public investments that are right for me. Not regulators. Public investments should be available to all of the public, not just the privileged.

I have been managing my own investments for 30 years, and I shouldn't have to go through any special process like passing a test before I can invest in public securities like leveraged and inverse funds. I am already capable of understanding leveraged and inverse funds and their risks, I do not need these measures imposed on me.

Behrad Saleh Comment On Regulatory Notice 22-08

Dear Madam, Sir,

I strongly believe passing this law would hurt investors like me who are getting to the capital market with small investments and using inverse funds as a hedge strategy to beat the market volatility, even though it is a small portion of my overall portfolio.

I believe public investment should be available to all of the public without any requirement of passing a test. Anyone who is getting into investing in reverse funds, is already aware of the associated risks. Capital Markets are always involved with risks and successful investors know that very well.