Skip to main content

Richard Foran Comment On Regulatory Notice 22-08

No politician should vote to restrict our choices of personal investment especially given the track record of politicians using material non-public information with regularity for years. Politicians did not have the ethical standards to make it illegal all those years, I see no reason why they should try to restrict inverse products in front of a potential recession and stock market drop. I'm sure they will be excluded from these restrictions and the imbalance it will likely cause. This is pretty outrageous.

Matt Huber Comment On Regulatory Notice 22-08

Regulators need to keep their noses out of investor's business. We should be free to choose which investments we purchase, or ignore. Not only does making regulations more strict go against the very nature of the United States, it could greatly endanger those holding positions in those securities as holders could be forced out at inopportune times leading to forced losses BY THE REGULATORS. This would be the biggest tragedy of all, regulators CAUSING LOSSES to protect the public!

Dwayne Witten Comment On Regulatory Notice 22-08

Regarding my right to invest in leveraged and inverse funds.........................I oppose any further restrictions and / or requirements regarding my right to invest in any products in which I choose to invest. I have invested in leveraged and inverse funds for over 20 years and I do not believe that these products need to be regulated any further. I understand the risks and I believe that most people who invest in these types of funds also understand the risks. In fact, inverse funds act as a good hedge for market corrections and bear market as an alternative to cash.