Skip to main content

Robert Dooly Comment On Regulatory Notice 22-08

I am opposed to further regulations to restrict or disqualify me from trading L&I Funds. I am aware of the high risk and short term volatility to valuations of these funds and the need for daily if not hourly monitoring and evaluation.
My brokerage firm, Fidelity, already provides a popup warning statement for me on these funds and it has been effective in causing second thoughts and in some cases a canceling of the trade. Thank you for considering my input.

Diana Rathbun Comment On Regulatory Notice 22-08

I disagree emphatically with limiting retail investors access to leveraged products and the inverse leveraged products. If one educates oneself, these products can be a highly effective means of benefiting from volatility in certain sectors.
The level of legislating for oneself is constantly being reduced to the lowest common denominator. Let's try to keep some sense of freedom of choice and stop underestimating each individual's ability to learn, grow, and prosper.

Aaron Sterling Comment On Regulatory Notice 22-08

It should be the investor's choice to invest in leveraged and inverse funds. These are important investment vehicles that should be researched by the investor just as any other investment choice they consider. Limiting or restricting an investor's investment options restricts their ability to do what is in their best interest. Many everyday investors use these investment options regularly with much success.

Katti Ming Comment On Regulatory Notice 22-08

I believe that most people who do choose to invest in these funds are aware of the risks and do their own homework before they start investing. While I do believe that offering education on the risks, as well as risk mitigation strategies, would be beneficial for traders, I do not believe that extra layers of bureaucracy and testing will create better or safer traders, and will simply reduce the activity on such funds unnecessarily. This is to no one's benefit.