Skip to main content

Thomas Cottone Comment On Regulatory Notice 22-08

I, and not regulators, should be able to choose the public
investments that are right for you and your family. Public investments should be available to all of the public, not just the privileged.
Investors should not have to go through any special process such as passing a test before you can invest in public securities, like leveraged and inverse funds. Explain that you are capable of understanding leveraged and inverse funds and their risks. Regulators have no right to imposed these measures on the investor.

Noel Brennan Comment On Regulatory Notice 22-08

I understand that regulations being considered by FINRA might impact my ability to invest in leveraged funds or place an unnecessary burden on being able to do so. I have been managing my portfolio for only a few years now and am on a fast learning curve. Investing in a triple leveraged index fund was not such a hard decision and I put less than 5% of my total wealth in it. I've made bigger mistakes than that! I don't understand why FINRA would do this when we investing in cryptocurrency, meme stocks and other risky assets are much scarier in my opinion.

Jennifer Barbara Comment On Regulatory Notice 22-08

Like my husband posted as well, I share his sentiments exactly:

I am an experienced investor who is aware of how ETFs and inverse type funds work. Like any other investment there is due diligence and risk, which I accept. I dont think FINRA should over reach and and limit availability and access to these instruments. Instead, they should focus more in investor education, especially to younger generations that are crafting their investment strategies, and not focus on closing access to these instruments.