I oppose to it this law

Way to much government and the loss of rights of privacy.

Limiting access to public investments will limit our ability to navigate complicated financial markets exacerbated by Federal Reserve policy. When all investments are going the same direction for extended periods of time an inverse fund is the safest way to hedge. These tools need to be available to everyone and not just an elite educated class.

I should be able to choose the public
investments that are right for me.
Public investments should be available to all of the public,
not just the privileged.....

You are encroaching on my freedoms again. This #22-08 Rule is not in line with our rights.

Too much big brother.

Stop trying to hamstring the common investor.

I firmly believe in my right to freely access the entirety of the public securities markets without arbitrary restrictions and oppose any and all limitations on my investments.

Comments: I oppose any further rule-making to limit access to so-called "complex products" (e.g. leveraged / inverse funds or ETFs). There are already plenty of warnings provided regarding the risky nature of these products. At my broker's website, for example, I receive a notification every time I attempt to purchase these products indicating their risky nature and suggesting that they are only suitable for short term trading in active accounts by well trained investors.

Crypto was designed to be "For the People" the government needs to stay out of it. Maybe instead of sending all our $ to Ukraine, you spend that $ directly on Americans.