Leveraged investing in TQQQ provided a way for me to retire ... because my $2,250 monthly social security is WAY BELOW a half-way decent standard of living.

$30 trillion in debt... and inflation similarly growing out of control, and you want to legislate away my ability to protect myself against my irresponsible Congress...obsurd!

Hello, I am incensed you are contemplating making it nearly impossible to purchase leveraged and inverse funds. They definitely have their place and have been used successfully by millions. Please - do not cripple investor's ability to use these funds.

Thanks for taking comments; we already have enough disclosure on on leveraged + inverse products. WE like our choices. [I do agree with Warren Buffet; crypto currency = ''rat poison''] I have gotten for years, a warning thru my broker on the ''..unique risks......'' for these .I already understand them..............................................

I, not regulators, should be able to choose the public investments that are right for me and my family. Public investments should be available to all of the public, not just the privileged.

I shouldn't have to go through any special process like passing a test before you can invest in public securities, like leveraged and inverse funds. I am capable of understanding leveraged and inverse funds and their risks. I do not need these measures imposed upon me.

We need to be able to participate in these kinds of investments in order to catch up what we've lost and manage our futures. I appreciate your attempts to help, but we need to be able to choose our own investments, take our own risks, learn from our mistakes, and benefit from our own risk-taking. I do not want you telling me what I can or cannot do, and I do not appreciate you feeling like you have to protect me from myself. I'm a well-educated, smart, courageous individual and do not need your help in this area.

we should be able to choose the public investments that are right for us and our family. Public investments should be available to all of the public, not just the privileged. We shouldn't have to go through any special process like passing a test before we can invest in public securities, like leveraged and inverse funds. We are capable of understanding leveraged and inverse funds and their risks Leveraged and inverse funds are important to our investment strategies.

I do not need you telling me what I can or can't invest it. I't my responsibility to assume risk, not yours. Quit being the nanny state.

Dear FINRA,

I am opposed to regulations which restrict or limit my ability to invest. An investment decision should be that of the investor itself not the regulators. As an accredited investor I do not want regulators to limit my ability to invest in leveraged or inverse funds if I would like to do so. Thank you .

Devin Murphy

I am a very middle class investor, taxed to the max. I invest through a broker. My feeling is FINRA decisions always support the Wall Street, gang ! My feelings are stocks and regulators are extremely difficult for folks like me to I understand, thus my broker. To be Wall Street has been one a gang of thieves thrive by on us. A [REDACTED] recommendation to co trimly forget investments, even more, is a perfect example of how the gang seeks to manipulate the middle class.

I believe that investors should have the ability to invest in the securities of their choosing. While some are more complex and volatile than others, investors are consenting adults who are aware they must live with their consequences.

I believe that signing a document that acknowledges such extra risk is acceptable, as it makes investors aware of such volatility.

However applying safeguards such as net worth, requirement of specialized investment knowledge, or periods where investment isn't possible will prevent scores of people from building wealth effectively.