Skip to main content

Michael Daud Comment On Regulatory Notice 22-08

I am already very disappointed with existing Accredited Investor laws. This prevented me from buying many shares of companies pre-IPO, which have since soared. Simply because I did not have enough net worth.

If I had made these investments, I could likely now qualify as an accredited investor.

More regulation in this regard stifles freedom for small investors, and assumes all are idiots.

Charles Becker Comment On Regulatory Notice 22-08

So now, you LOYAL CITIZENS WANT TO LIMIT MY FREEDOM OF USING MY INCOME. AND MAKE SURE NO ONE ELSE CAN *"""BUY THEIR WAY INTO POWER AS Y'ALL DID. SCARY BEING AT THE TOP WITH SKELETONS. WELL PASS THIS AND IT WONT BE LONG. NO, NO THREAT FROM ME. KARMA ALWAYS COMES FROM BEHIND U JUST LIKE A BIG CAT IN THE SHADOWS. AND YES I CAN SPIN AS FOOD AS YOU. ROME DID NOT FALL IN A DAY, BUT EACH DAY WAS FULL OF LIES AND UNIVERSAL DISTRUST. MUCH LIKE NOW!!!

Tim Garlick Comment On Regulatory Notice 22-08

I am writing to contest in the strongest possible way your intent to limit investment in leveraged or inverse funds. As adults, it is every American's right to make investment choices on their own. Whether they are smart or dumb choices, regulators have no business acting as nannies for grown adults.

Rather than putting the burden on the individual investor, you should focus on the firms that offer these products to ensure that they are being explicit and straightforward in describing their products so that investors can make informed decisions.