Gary Upperman Comment On Regulatory Notice 22-08
I have the right to make my own decisions which investments to invest in and not be told by regulators that I can't.
For the Public
FINRA Data provides non-commercial use of data, specifically the ability to save data views and create and manage a Bond Watchlist.
For Industry Professionals
Registered representatives can fulfill Continuing Education requirements, view their industry CRD record and perform other compliance tasks.
For Member Firms
Firm compliance professionals can access filings and requests, run reports and submit support tickets.
I have the right to make my own decisions which investments to invest in and not be told by regulators that I can't.
You are not regulators. I should be able to chose my own style of investment. It should be available to all of the public. I should not have to go through any examination or testing before I can invest into public securities. I understand leverage and invest funds and their risks. Leveraged and inverse funds are extremely important for my investment strategy. These securities help me to protect my investments and get enhanced returns if I use them as a limited part of my overall portfolio
An investor in securities should not need regulators to ban public investments. Let the buyer beware as we do in most things being sold to the public. Investors are capable of the understanding of leverage and of inverse funds and the risks they entail. I have used these types of funds in the past as a limited part of my investment strategy, and would not be pleased to lose the ability to use them in the future. It is not fair to allow the privileged to use them when average investors are not allowed.
I strongly appose any such rules!
I am investing into leveraged funds from last many years and would like to keep my right to invest in these funds without any additional requirement.
Srongly believe the proposed regulations are: Bad for Investors. If the proposal is adopted, some investors who could benefit from the enhanced return and portfolio protection potential of leveraged and inverse funds could be prevented from buying them by an overly burdensome qualification process. Brokerage firms could even stop offering these funds altogether due to the difficulty of implementing the regulations. Unnecessary. The SEC has not shown there is a problem that needs to be solved with respect to leveraged and inverse funds.
do not make decisions on my behalf...please let me choose how I want to invest my retirement money
I should be able to freely choose my investment products and not have to my freedoms taken away at the sole discretion of the government. I oppose this proposed action.
We Americans not regulators should be able to choose the public investments that are right for us and our family. Public investments should be available to all of the public, not just the privileged. We shouldn't have to go through any special process like passing a test before wevcan invest in public securities, like leveraged and inverse funds. Any average person of average intelligence is capable of understanding leveraged and inverse funds and their risks. We do not need these measures imposed on us.
There is no viable reason to restrict access to inverse or leveraged funds from the public. Having been investing my own retirement funds for 20 years I well understand the risks involved. They are an appropriate part of a well balanced portfolio. Hedging and being able to take some advantage of downtrends must not be restricted to professionals and the super wealthy. Anyone with the willingness to understand markets should be able to participate it any investment they wish. Free markets. That is the goal, no?