Skip to main content

Samuel Wolobah Comment On Regulatory Notice 22-08

I oppose restrictions on my right to invest in public investments. I not regulators, should be able to choose the public investments that are right for me and my family. Public investments should be available to all of the public, not just the privileged. I shouldn't have to go through any special process like passing a test before I can invest in public securities, like leveraged and inverse funds. I am capable of understanding leveraged and inverse funds and their risks. I do not need these measures imposed on me. Leveraged and inverse funds are important to my investment strategies.

Kourosh Arianejad Comment On Regulatory Notice 22-08

I should be able to choose the public investments that are right for you and your family. Public investments should be available to all of the public, not just the privileged. As a self-taught investor, leveraged and inverse funds have become an important part of my investment strategy. They are the easiest way for ordinary Americans like myself to either take defensive investment strategies as a hedge to the bulk of their portfolio, or as an intentional investment made based upon current market situations.

Ronald Larkin Comment On Regulatory Notice 22-08

I should be able to be able to short stocks just like the professionals. They would not like to be restricted either! It is an unfair playing field when you have to play by different rules than other investors. It's called cheating! I should be able to not have restrictions on my IRA either and should be allowed to short stocks like other investors and now you want to take away the only avenue that an IRA investor has to short the market by removing short leveraged ETFs. Well then lift the restrictions on shorting stocks in an IRA and then we wouldn't' need short ETFs.