Skip to main content

Peter Obermeyer Comment On Regulatory Notice 22-08

As an individual investor, I understand investing is inherently risky and it is my responsibility to evaluate each asset allocation with this in mind. I use leveraged and inverse products to manage risk and hedge long-term positions. The ability to do so cheaply and efficiently is critical to my strategy. My fear as it pertains to this regulation is that it will increase costs and make it more difficult for individual investors like me to access techniques for improving risk adjusted returns, exacerbating an unequal playing field in financial markets. Thank you for your consideration.

Eric Kasten Comment On Regulatory Notice 22-08

Typically, loss due to investment in funds is limited to the amount an investor was willing to use for purchasing those funds. Investing in leveraged and inverse funds is a useful tool for individual investors as it provides a mechanism by which to improve ROI when regular funds may be doing poorly. In all cases investors should be doing some research and consideration of risk before investing in funds or stocks; inverse and leveraged funds are no different.

Edward Dougherty Comment On Regulatory Notice 22-08

Given that our government continues to promote low interest rate environments where elder savers are punished, inverse etfs are an excellent tool to hedge income based stock portfolios. Instead of focusing on singular market events to evaluate etf tracking error, the government should endeavor to actually study long term inverse etf tracking error and counter party risk. Leveraged etfs are dangerous and might need more regulation, But Finra would be better off spending time on rules for crypto and new retail brokerage apps (read Robinhood).