Skip to main content

William Dixon Comment On Regulatory Notice 22-08

As an investor I want and deserve the freedom to make my own choices about assets in which I invest. The SEC should not be taking on the role of "big brother" to oversee and perhaps overrule the decisions of millions of investors. Many of the decisions that all Americans make carry risks even greater than our investments. For example, the person we choose to marry or our career choices, even where we choose to live. As Americans we enjoy freedom to make choices and mistakes and to live with the consequences. What rule number S720 415 proposes to do is to deprive us of that very freedom.

Brett Combs Comment On Regulatory Notice 22-08

I wanted to voice my opposition to SEC Proposed Rule #S7-24-15. As a consumer and investorI feel it is might right to choose investments that I have researched and vetted while being free of regulatory restrictions. The SEC needs to understand that with the Internet people are more informed than in the history of investing in the United States and are able to make informed decisions without having to pass any hurdles that would restrict investing. Leveraged and inverse investments are part of my overall investment strategy to hedge during economic downturns.

Suzanne Elliott Comment On Regulatory Notice 22-08

I am an engineer by training and regularly handle economic calculations and risk assessment for my job as well as my personal activities. I should not be required to take training or pass tests to invest as I do now; much less be forced into cooling off periods related to my investment strategies. To be clear, I am also one of the folks that paid back all my college student loans and am sick and tired of all the current Fed Administration's overreach and wasteful spending of my tax dollars.