Skip to main content

David Wolfgang Comment On Regulatory Notice 22-08

The is an addendum to a previous comment I made. Prohibiting inverse funds would remove people's ability to hedge against down markets in a cost effective manner. The expense ratios of these inverse and leveraged inverse funds are much more manageable than taking out margin loans and opening oneself up to margin calls. The liquidity and affordability of these fund should not and cannot be limited to only a select few.

Richard Gordon Comment On Regulatory Notice 22-08

I have personally been an investor for years and utilise leveraged investment products to boost my returns. I know the risks involved and choose to use a small portion of my overall money invested in these products to supplement standard, non-leveraged mutual and exchange traded funds. The leveraged funds are already regulated and restricted to have limited offerings. Taking away more freedom to invest in what is available feels like my rights and freedoms are being removed. More regulation is not needed.

Alex Meier Comment On Regulatory Notice 22-08

Stop trying to control individual ability to participate in public markets. You show yourselves to be autocrats fighting to maintain an imbalanced and tiered society when you limit access to the wide world of available financial products and strategies. FINRA is not a government agency. Congress and the SEC should not being delegating their authority over markets to a cartel lobbyist group like FINRA.