Skip to main content

Dilip Adityan Comment On Regulatory Notice 22-08

I am capable of investing in risky assets like inverse leveraged and leveraged accounts. I do my research with high quality support from FundStrat and read Barrons, Wall Street Journal and follow many analysts. Me not regulators should be able to choose the public investments that are right for you and your family. Public investments should be available to all of the public, not just the privileged. I shouldn't have to go through any special process like passing a test before you can invest in public securities, like leveraged and inverse funds.

Jeremiah Haremza Comment On Regulatory Notice 22-08

I am disappointed in the possible restrictions that Rule #S7-24-15 would impose upon myself and other retail investors. Both leveraged and inverse funds, while not my sole investment, do hold an important place in my overall investment strategy. I have put time and effort into researching and selecting the funds I currently hold in my investment portfolio. This includes back-testing and comparing rival and similar strategies and investments. I understand the possible risks including volatility of the leveraged and inverse funds I have chosen.

Joshua Hykes Comment On Regulatory Notice 22-08

Please do not further restrict or regulate public trading in leveraged ETFs. My family uses several leveraged ETFs to smooth our investment risk over time (temporal diversification). Leveraged ETFs are easy and tax-efficient means to increase our investment exposure early in our accumulation phase so that we can take less risk near the end of the accumulation phase. Additional regulation will likely make it harder to find such products, and increase the associated fees due to less competition.