Ariel Wainer Comment On Regulatory Notice 22-08
This rule is very unjust
For the Public
FINRA Data provides non-commercial use of data, specifically the ability to save data views and create and manage a Bond Watchlist.
For Industry Professionals
Registered representatives can fulfill Continuing Education requirements, view their industry CRD record and perform other compliance tasks.
For Member Firms
Firm compliance professionals can access filings and requests, run reports and submit support tickets.
This rule is very unjust
I think I have the ability to select the assets I invest in. I have an MBA in finance which I think gives me the ability to select the investments I make. However, I think public investments should not be limited to which member of the public invests in them. While I have passed several Finra exams, I don't think every member of the public should be required to before investing in leveraged investments, Leveraged and inverse funds are important to my investment strategy. I use inverse ETF's instead of shorting stocks.
I undertsand the volatility and how they work. IMHO, They are safer then many speculative growth funds, meme stocks, and crypto.
As an investor I think I fully capable of understanding how Levered and Inverse funds work. Public investments should be available to all of the public, not just the privileged. It is paternalistic to assume all retail investors are woo unsophisticated to trade ETFs such as these. Further, I, and other retail investors, frequently trade options, which truthfully are harder to understand and potentially more dangerous to investors .
What I decide to buy/sell is my business not yours. If you want to offer protection that should be MY choice to take, not yours to thrust upon me. I resent regulators doing that.
Buying these funds isn't any different from investing in high beta stocks, and I'd argue it's actually safer than doing so by focusing on a basket of stocks in a certain sector than only one. It's also safer than trading options, which is what people will be forced to do if they can't trade leveraged ETFs.
I oppose any further restrictions on my ability to invest in leveraged funds.
Please don't interrupt and twist the free market, regulators. Stay away.
Good afternoon, I write to you today as a retail investor who is building a small portfolio. I have found leveraged and inverse ETF products to be integral to my trading strategy, as they allow for enhanced returns. When I first began trading and trying to find ways to enhance my returns, I tried options and nearly wiped out my portfolio. I had to start all over again, and vowed never to use options again. I turned to leveraged and inverse ETFs, and now I am finally able to grow my capital.
We, the US investing public, need the ability to "short" stock market indices, equity sectors, currencies & commodities, just as the institutions do, to hedge our portfolios and protect the downside in our investment accounts. To not be able to do so would punish the "little guy" and provide all the benefit to the big institutions. We individual investors are acutely aware of the risks and the benefits in doing so, and need to be able to protect our assets.