Skip to main content

Matthew Soren Comment On Regulatory Notice 22-08

We should all have the equal opportunity to choose public investments that are best for our families. Public investments should be available to everyone, not just the privileged. Like any investment, we are aware of the risks and should have that same privilege to invest how we choose. Additionally, many of these investments are crucial to hedge against other positions and market volatility. There are many other growth companies I would not invest in without having leveraged and inversed funds as a portion of my portfolio.

John Armour Comment On Regulatory Notice 22-08

I strongly feel that American investors such as myself should continue to have the right to invest in leveraged & inverse ETF's if we so choose. To have some regulatory body make that decision for us I feel is un-American, un-called for and unnecessary. I have been investing in leveraged & inverse ETF's since 2013 and I continue to invest in them because of the great return they offer. Also in the case of inverse ETF's, it's a way I can short a certain market without having to pay interest on borrowing shares if I were to sell short that market directly.

Matthew Thornton Comment On Regulatory Notice 22-08

Dear SEC, How dare you go after these instruments. Focus more of your energy on companies which do insider trading and when you do give fines they cannot be less than the money made. Inverse funds and short selling and leveraged funds give some advantages to average investors that institutional investors dont need. Please reconsider thiese "rules". Banks should not trade FDIC leveraged funds. Do something about that