Skip to main content

John Hoffman Comment On Regulatory Notice 22-08

Dear SEC, Rule #S7-24-15: I personally should be able to choose the public investments which I deem appropriate for me and my family. NOT you! Just because some may be privileged doesn't mean only they should have access. I do not need to pass some special test or have money as the privileged do to have access to a public investment. Leverage and inverse funds play an important part of a portfolio to protect the average investor. Do NOT make it harder/impossible for someone not really privileged but still able to participate in public investment. Common sense applies in this consideration.

Monica Ferguson Comment On Regulatory Notice 22-08

It is my money and only I should have the right to choose which investments I pursue. I am fully aware of the investment risks. That's why prospectuses are available. Additionally, these type of inverse and leveraged funds are excellent tools to hedge portfolios which all funds may not be held at one firm.

Stay out of my financial affairs. Having over thirty years of investment experience taught me a few things about over-regulation and too little about investor education. Focus on the latter than the former.

Matthew Gooch Comment On Regulatory Notice 22-08

I oppose changing the current regulations regarding investment in leveraged funds.

Public investment should remain open to the public.

I am capable of making and accepting my investment choices without the need of special tests or permissions instituted by your agency.
Leverage funds play a key role in my portfolio and I am the one who makes these decisions. I dont desire or want changes made that would potentially cripple my plans.