Skip to main content

Carl Unterweiser Comment On Regulatory Notice 22-08

While investor restrictions/limitations with regard to leveraged funds might appear to somehow help investors (I guess protecting them from themselves), it would actually hurt me and others that I know. I am not a high wealth individual but have taken the time to learn how all ETFs work, including leveraged funds. They have become an important element of my investment strategy. I do not need this protection- it would only harm me.

Benjamin Ammon Comment On Regulatory Notice 22-08

I do not support regulators imposing unnecessary burdens on investors that limit our ability to access publicly traded securities. This is a push from special interests to drive business to them and limit the ability of individuals to make investments as they see fit. Leveraged ETFs are a small part of my portfolio and are used to enhance returns. I am fully aware of the risks of the compounding negative returns. We do not need the government vetting investors. This is overreach and unreasonable.

Yi Sun Comment On Regulatory Notice 22-08

I not regulators should be able to choose the public investments that are right for myself and my family. Public investments should be available to all of the public, not just the privileged! Leveraged and inverse funds are important to my investment strategies. The leverage and inverse funds protect my investments and enhanced returns and are very improtant parts of my overall portfolio. I have more than 10 yesrs experences on investments I am sure I can understand leveraged and inverse funds and their risks.