| FINRA.org Skip to main content

Jonathan Leman Comment On Regulatory Notice 22-08

I think it's extremely important that professional advisors have the ability to work with or against the general market directions from the standpoint of hedging client portfolios, and these funds are the easiest and most efficient ways to implement these hedges. For example if the markets are down 15% this year and a hedge with this type of fund means only -8% loss for clients then they are very critical tool that should not be taken away.

Terence Riley Comment On Regulatory Notice 22-08

I totally disagree with the proposal to regulate leveraged and inverse ETF's. They should be available to everyone, not just high net worth individuals. I understand the risks and use them strategically as a small fraction of my overall portfolio. I do not need anyone telling me what to do, or having to prove myself capable. I also totally disagree with the current regulations that restrict hiring hedge fund managers to only high net worth individuals. Everyone should be allowed to participate if they can meet the specific funds minimum investment requirements.

Maria Zempoalteca Comment On Regulatory Notice 22-08

I, not regulators, should be able to choose the public investments that are right for me and my family! Public investments should be available to all of the public, not just the privileged. I shouldn't have to go through any special process, like passing a test before I can invest in public securities, like leveraged and inverse funds. I am capable of understanding leveraged and inverse funds and their risks. I do not need these measures imposed on me! Leveraged and inverse funds are important to my investment strategies. Leverage and inverse funds help me hedge my investments.