Skip to main content

Thomas Becker Comment On Regulatory Notice 22-08

To whom it may concern, As a private individual investor, I am adamantly opposed to any regulation restricting our access to leveraged and inverse funds. We do not need, nor want, the oversight and binding of regulators to protect us from our investment decisions and choices. Regulators consistently allow unrestricted free-reign to the investment bankers and Wall Street cronies who have captured the regulators, while trying to put the handcuffs on the public at large.

Jae Lee Comment On Regulatory Notice 22-08

How are you? I oppose restrictions to my right to invest. I should be able to choose the public investments. Public investments should be able to all of the public, not just the privileged. I should not have to go through any special process like passing a test before I can invest in public securities, like leveraged and invers fund. Because I understand that meaning of leveraged and invers fund and these are important to my investment strategies to help me hedge my investments and to seek enhanced return. Thank you very much. Stay Safe Jae woo lee

Anonymous Comment On Regulatory Notice 22-08

The regulations are guaranteed to harm investors. Investors do not need protection from themselves. Investors who invest in “complex” financial instruments are individuals who understand the relationship between risk and reward. The proposed regulations will not deter individuals from making financially risky decisions. Instead, the regulations will encourage individuals to invest in riskier alternatives (e.g., crypto, penny stocks, and SPACs). Everyone’s financial goals are different, and everyone should have the right to choose their investments freely.