Skip to main content

Dogan Kahraman Comment On Regulatory Notice 22-08

Eliminating the leveraged ETFs from the choices of investment vehicles is the wrong decision. If the leveraged ETFs are volatile, how about the individual securities, mutual funds, and options. Every investment tools in the stock market involve some degree of volatility and risk, even crossing the street in daily life has some degree of risk. Are we going to eliminate options because they include a high risk? The SEC proposed regulation of removing the leveraged ETFs from small investors is a bad regulation. IT IS PULLING THE CARPET UNDER OUR FEET.

Mark Frederick Comment On Regulatory Notice 22-08

I use leveraged and inverse funds regularly in my investment strategy. They are an integral part of my portfolio. I am fully capable of understanding all the risks associated with these funds and have knowingly chosen to include them in my portfolio after analyzing those risks. The brokerage firms already require signed documents in order to trade these instruments and they also give warnings before initiating trades.

Anne Gruscinski Comment On Regulatory Notice 22-08

Dear Friends, I have been investing since I was 17 years old, beginning with US Savings Bonds. With time, various employment, and higher wages, my investment strategies obviously changed from those beginnings. I now have a very diversified portfolio, which includes investments in ProShares. The recent news concerning potential regulatory changes is distressing. I do not agree with potential limitations to my ability to invest as I choose.