Skip to main content

Oleg Janke Comment On Regulatory Notice 22-08

Qualified investors (current status) should be allowed to invest in a variety of products including inverse and leveraged funds -- This is like call or put options--to maximize their opportunity. We should be made aware of the risks (current status), and enjoy the gains or suffer the losses.

You need to end Congressional exemption from insider trader rules before addressing inverse and leveraged products. That is where real abuse takes place.

Matthew Clark Comment On Regulatory Notice 22-08

I write to oppose this proposed regulation. Baring the little guy, the average American, from having the same investment tools as the sophisticated institutional investors only perpetuates keeping the poor poor and the rich rich. It flies in the face of our capitalist system. It does nothing to "protect" investors. As an investor I could legally go to Vegas and lose every penny in a casino overnight, but this regulation would prevent me from investing in an SEC regulated and approved, fairly commonplace investment strategy.

Paul Butuc Comment On Regulatory Notice 22-08

Here in USA we believe in freedom, and that it bears responsibility for your choices, including the potential loss of invested principal. While i'm not really concerned about a knowledge test (which i find tho useless, easy to cheat on and just another taxpayer and investor added cost), brokerage approval or certifying reading the materials, as we do believe education is important before making an investment decision, i do oppose limitations that would make these innovative alternative investments unavailable to the general public, retail investor, including me: 1.